Thread:Spectre Leeloo Shepard/@comment-1814425-20200627023359/@comment-25356303-20200628025244

A pre-release disclaimer would be appropriate. We use this for new content on TES all the time. Once the content is released, we can remove the notices from articles.

Re infoboxes, if you just want to combine weapon articles between 2020 and 2077, I think that depends on what stats they have in the new game. As a rule of thumb, tabbers are something to be cautious about (read: should probably avoid). There are some portable tabbers on Fandom now, as Mechemik said, but they only work totally correctly on mobile if the contents being flipped through are identical, e.g. weapons in 2020 have exactly the same types of stats as weapons in 2077. But more generally, tabbers just aren't utilized very well by readers, so the content that's hidden by default easily gets overlooked. If you just want to limit the number of different infoboxes you have to maintain, you could add a variable for the game that changes which fields appear via a Lua script (Module), or through parser functions (although they're a bit slower).

Personally, I like to avoid combining content from different games altogether, except in lore articles or whatever. I know that this isn't the standard on the Witcher Wiki, where they combine things from the different games. But usually readers are looking for info about one specific manifestation of a weapon, so when they see content from another game, they sometimes just get confused (I certainly have, haha). What you could do instead is have  and   and a disambiguation page (I would think) as. But that's just my take.

The Discussions (/d) is just a forum for the wiki, much like the old Special:Forum (which currently redirects there). Right now, the Cyberpunk Wiki doesn't appear on the Fandom mobile app, but I can talk to Mira Laime about getting it added closer to release. Most people on Discussions just want to chat, but it can still be a good recruitment ground for editors. On TES, we've gotten admins, rollbacks, moderators, and news team members out of it, as well as any number of non-staff editors. Of course, these results will require posts from admins directing people to editing resources and projects, but it's possible to achieve anywhere. Presumably, once the mobile app receives an editing function (soon-ish?), more users will start to engage with the wiki after getting their start on /d.

P.S. the Discord server has the capacity to be another useful resource for editors. Even in relatively off-peak times like this, we use it a fair bit on Elder Scrolls to ask little questions that might not merit a talk page message, and to teach new users various things about editing. It does require moderation, but as the community grows, I'm sure that there'll be some willing candidates.